Criteria
The Criteria for Accreditation are the standards of quality by which the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) determines whether an institution merits accreditation or reaffirmation of accreditation. Each criterion is made up of Core Components and Sub-Components. The institution will be reaffirmed for accreditation if it is found to meet Core Components.
Criteria
Mission
Criterion 1. Mission
The institution’s mission is clear and articulated publicly; it guides the institution’s operations.
Core Components
1.A. The institution’s mission is articulated publicly and operationalized throughout the institution.
1.B. The institution’s mission demonstrates commitment to the public good.
1.C. The institution provides opportunities for civic engagement in a diverse, multicultural society and globally connected world, as appropriate within its mission and for the constituencies it serves.
To view GateWay's Vision, Mission, Core Values & Strategic Priorities, click here.
Team:
Suzanne Alexander
Terese Brown
Dr. Amy Diaz
Kristin Gubser
Dr. John Kelly
Jacquelyn Orr
Jessie Palacio
Michelle Ray
Integrity
Criterion 2. Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct
The institution acts with integrity; its conduct is ethical and responsible.
Core Components
2.A. The institution establishes and follows policies and processes to ensure fair and ethical behavior on the part of its governing board, administration, faculty and staff.
2.B. The institution presents itself clearly and completely to its students and to the public.
2.C. The governing board of the institution is autonomous to make decisions in the best interest of the institution in compliance with board policies and to ensure the institution’s integrity.
2.D. The institution is committed to academic freedom and freedom of expression in the pursuit of truth in teaching and learning.
2.E. The institution’s policies and procedures call for responsible acquisition, discovery and application of knowledge by its faculty, staff and students.
Team:
Dr. Ryan Aiello
Maribel Zuniga Gonzalez
Ann Marie Rucker
Mario Sneezy
Dr. Joseph Swaba
Dr. Lora Timmons
Xaxiri Yamane
Teaching and Learning
Criterion 3. Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support
The institution provides quality education, wherever and however its offerings are delivered.
Core Components
3.A. The rigor of the institution’s academic offerings is appropriate to higher education.
3.B. The institution offers programs that engage students in collecting, analyzing and communicating information; in mastering modes of intellectual inquiry or creative work; and in developing skills adaptable to changing environments.
3.C. The institution has the faculty and staff needed for effective, high-quality programs and student services.
3.D. The institution provides support for student learning and resources for effective teaching.
Team:
D'Vette Alonzo
Dr. Amy Diaz
Shala Dveirin
Matt Jolly
Beth Malapanes
Laura Safa
Tom Smith
Nancy Sounart
Zach Romo
Danny Vingochea
Herb Wildey
Second Block
Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement
Criterion 4. Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement
The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement.
Core Components
4.A. The institution ensures the quality of its educational offerings.
4.B. The institution engages in ongoing assessment of student learning as part of its commitment to the educational outcomes of its students.
4.C. The institution pursues educational improvement through goals and strategies that improve retention, persistence and completion rates in its degree and certificate programs.
Team:
Mika Davis
Kristie Fok
Jennifer Kline
Shannon McGrath
Tracey Schartz
Brandy Thompson
Doug Walker
Dr. Delfi Wilson
Dr. Tina Wixom
Dr. Sharon Zygowicz
Institutional Effectiveness, Resources and Planning
Criterion 5. Institutional Effectiveness, Resources and Planning
The institution’s resources, structures, and processes are sufficient to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its educational offerings, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.
Core Components
5.A. Through its administrative structures and collaborative processes, the institution’s leadership demonstrates that it is effective and enables the institution to fulfill its mission.
5.B. The institution’s resource base supports its educational offerings and its plans form maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future.
5.C. The institution engages in systematic and integrated planning and improvement.
Team:
Tony Asti
Stacey Boyd
Dr. Kelly Greene
Senadz Lubovac
Otis McDaniel
Mario Salinas
Ceci Villa
Kristy Warfield